0.05/0.10 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.05/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.09/0.30 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu 0.09/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.09/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.09/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.09/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 1440 0.09/0.30 % WCLimit : 180 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Thu Jul 4 05:36:53 EDT 2024 0.09/0.30 % CPUTime : 0.15/0.42 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.15/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.PsSALInOWq/E---3.1_20573.p 0.15/0.43 # Version: 3.2.0-ho 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNSSN. 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh3 with 900s (5) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh2lt with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting ho_unfolding_1 with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # ehoh_best8_lambda with pid 20653 completed with status 0 0.15/0.43 # Result found by ehoh_best8_lambda 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNSSN. 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh3 with 900s (5) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # No SInE strategy applied 0.15/0.43 # Search class: HGHNF-FFSF22-SSSFFFNN 0.15/0.43 # partial match(2): HGHNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh3 with 98s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # sh3 with pid 20656 completed with status 0 0.15/0.43 # Result found by sh3 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNSSN. 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh3 with 900s (5) cores 0.15/0.43 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # No SInE strategy applied 0.15/0.43 # Search class: HGHNF-FFSF22-SSSFFFNN 0.15/0.43 # partial match(2): HGHNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh3 with 98s (1) cores 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.15/0.43 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.15/0.43 0.15/0.43 # Proof found! 0.15/0.43 # SZS status Theorem 0.15/0.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.15/0.43 thf(decl_22, type, f: $o > $i > $i). 0.15/0.43 thf(decl_23, type, p: ($i > $i) > $o). 0.15/0.43 thf(decl_24, type, a: ($i > $i) > $o). 0.15/0.43 thf(decl_25, type, b: $o). 0.15/0.43 thf(conj, conjecture, ((p @ (^[X1:$i]:(f @ (((b)&(a @ (^[X1:$i]:(f @ ((b)) @ X1))))) @ X1)))=>(p @ (f @ (((a @ (f @ ((b))))&(b)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.PsSALInOWq/E---3.1_20573.p', conj)). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((((~(((b)&((~(b)|(a @ (f @ $true)))&((b)|(a @ (f @ $false))))))|(p @ (f @ $true)))&(((b)&((~(b)|(a @ (f @ $true)))&((b)|(a @ (f @ $false)))))|(p @ (f @ $false))))=>((~((((~(b)|(a @ (f @ $true)))&((b)|(a @ (f @ $false))))&(b)))|(p @ (f @ $true)))&((((~(b)|(a @ (f @ $true)))&((b)|(a @ (f @ $false))))&(b))|(p @ (f @ $false)))))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj])])])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, (((((~(b)|(b)|~(b)|(p @ (f @ $true)))&(~(a @ (f @ $false))|(b)|~(b)|(p @ (f @ $true))))&((~(b)|~(a @ (f @ $true))|~(b)|(p @ (f @ $true)))&(~(a @ (f @ $false))|~(a @ (f @ $true))|~(b)|(p @ (f @ $true)))))&(((b)|(p @ (f @ $false)))&((~(b)|(a @ (f @ $true))|(p @ (f @ $false)))&((b)|(a @ (f @ $false))|(p @ (f @ $false))))))&(((((((~(b)|(b)|~(b)|(~(b)|(a @ (f @ $true))))&(~(a @ (f @ $false))|(b)|~(b)|(~(b)|(a @ (f @ $true)))))&((~(b)|~(a @ (f @ $true))|~(b)|(~(b)|(a @ (f @ $true))))&(~(a @ (f @ $false))|~(a @ (f @ $true))|~(b)|(~(b)|(a @ (f @ $true))))))&(~(p @ (f @ $false))|(~(b)|(a @ (f @ $true)))))&((((~(b)|(b)|~(b)|((b)|(a @ (f @ $false))))&(~(a @ (f @ $false))|(b)|~(b)|((b)|(a @ (f @ $false)))))&((~(b)|~(a @ (f @ $true))|~(b)|((b)|(a @ (f @ $false))))&(~(a @ (f @ $false))|~(a @ (f @ $true))|~(b)|((b)|(a @ (f @ $false))))))&(~(p @ (f @ $false))|((b)|(a @ (f @ $false))))))&((((~(b)|(b)|~(b)|(b))&(~(a @ (f @ $false))|(b)|~(b)|(b)))&((~(b)|~(a @ (f @ $true))|~(b)|(b))&(~(a @ (f @ $false))|~(a @ (f @ $true))|~(b)|(b))))&(~(p @ (f @ $false))|(b))))&((((~(b)|(b)|~(b)|~(p @ (f @ $true)))&(~(a @ (f @ $false))|(b)|~(b)|~(p @ (f @ $true))))&((~(b)|~(a @ (f @ $true))|~(b)|~(p @ (f @ $true)))&(~(a @ (f @ $false))|~(a @ (f @ $true))|~(b)|~(p @ (f @ $true)))))&(~(p @ (f @ $false))|~(p @ (f @ $true)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, (~((b))|~((a @ (f @ (($true)))))|~((b))|~((p @ (f @ (($true)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ((b)|~((p @ (f @ (~($true)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ((b)|(p @ (f @ (~($true))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ((p @ (f @ (($true))))|~((b))|~((a @ (f @ (($true)))))|~((b))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (~((b))|~((p @ (f @ (($true)))))|~((a @ (f @ (($true)))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (b), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_4, c_0_5])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ((p @ (f @ (($true))))|~((b))|~((a @ (f @ (($true)))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (~((p @ (f @ (($true)))))|~((a @ (f @ (($true)))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ((a @ (f @ (($true))))|(p @ (f @ (~($true))))|~((b))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ~((a @ (f @ (($true))))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_8])]), c_0_10])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ((a @ (f @ (($true))))|~((p @ (f @ (~($true)))))|~((b))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, (p @ (f @ (~($true)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_8])]), c_0_12])). 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_8]), c_0_14])]), c_0_12]), ['proof']). 0.15/0.43 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.15/0.43 # Parsed axioms : 5 0.15/0.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.15/0.43 # Initial clauses : 31 0.15/0.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 20 0.15/0.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 11 0.15/0.43 # Processed clauses : 9 0.15/0.43 # ...of these trivial : 1 0.15/0.43 # ...subsumed : 1 0.15/0.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 6 0.15/0.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.15/0.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.15/0.43 # Backward-subsumed : 1 0.15/0.43 # Backward-rewritten : 2 0.15/0.43 # Generated clauses : 0 0.15/0.43 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1 0.15/0.43 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.15/0.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2 0.15/0.43 # Paramodulations : 0 0.15/0.43 # Factorizations : 0 0.15/0.43 # NegExts : 0 0.15/0.43 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.15/0.43 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.15/0.43 # Total rewrite steps : 9 0.15/0.43 # ...of those cached : 7 0.15/0.43 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.15/0.43 # Propositional check models : 0 0.15/0.43 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.15/0.43 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.15/0.43 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.15/0.43 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.15/0.43 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.15/0.43 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.15/0.43 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.15/0.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 3 0.15/0.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2 0.15/0.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.15/0.43 # Negative unit clauses : 1 0.15/0.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 0 0.15/0.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3 0.15/0.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 8 0.15/0.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.15/0.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 3 0.15/0.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2 0.15/0.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2 0.15/0.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2 0.15/0.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1 0.15/0.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.15/0.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2 0.15/0.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 2 0.15/0.43 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.15/0.43 # Condensation successes : 0 0.15/0.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1298 0.15/0.43 # Search garbage collected termcells : 160 0.15/0.43 0.15/0.43 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.15/0.43 # User time : 0.003 s 0.15/0.43 # System time : 0.001 s 0.15/0.43 # Total time : 0.004 s 0.15/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1760 pages 0.15/0.43 0.15/0.43 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.15/0.43 # User time : 0.003 s 0.15/0.43 # System time : 0.003 s 0.15/0.43 # Total time : 0.006 s 0.15/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1700 pages 0.15/0.43 % E---3.1 exiting 0.15/0.43 % E exiting 0.15/0.43 EOF